Katerina Siniakova vs Kristina Mladenovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent Second Serve Performance:

In the past six months, Siniakova has demonstrated a commendable prowess in second serve performance, triumphing in 44.41% of points. In contrast, Mladenovic has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 39.02%. It is important to note that this particular statistical indicator holds a significant correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.

Return Game Statistics:

Delving into recent return game statistics, Siniakova emerges as a formidable force. She has dominated her opponents' second serve points, securing a remarkable 57.34% success rate. Conversely, Mladenovic falls slightly behind with a success rate of 58.74%. The first serve return game statistics also offer valuable insights, with Siniakova achieving a 38.94% success rate and Mladenovic capturing 41.81%. These figures hold immense significance in determining the favored contender in this highly-anticipated head-to-head matchup.

Under Pressure Analysis:

When it comes to handling high-pressure situations, Siniakova exhibits exceptional skill. She has successfully saved 52.34% of breakpoints in recent matches. On the other hand, Mladenovic has proven herself adept at saving breakpoints as well, with a saving rate of 50.18%. This statistic serves as a valuable resource for making in-game betting predictions.

Performance Overview:

An overarching analysis of their performances over the past year positions Siniakova as the more triumphant player, winning 57.89% of matches played (with a win-loss ratio of 33/24). Mladenovic, while still commendable, boasts a winning percentage of 44.26% (with a win-loss ratio of 27/34). Such comprehensive statistics offer a reliable overview for predicting the outcome of their impending head-to-head encounter.

Surface Specialization:

Significant disparities in surface performance emerge between Siniakova and Mladenovic. When competing on clay, Siniakova flourishes with a remarkable win percentage of 63% (W/L 127/75). However, her performance weakens when playing on hard surfaces, with a win percentage of 54% (W/L 157/134). Mladenovic, in contrast, thrives on indoor hard surfaces, boasting a formidable win percentage of 61% (W/L 102/65). Conversely, her performance on hard surfaces appears less robust, with a win percentage of 47% (W/L 172/191).

Player Level:

Over the past year, Siniakova has predominantly competed on the main tour, solidifying her skills and achieving an impressive 64.71% win rate (W/L 22/12). On the other hand, Mladenovic has primarily participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10,000. In this lower-tier circuit, she holds a decent win percentage of 48.08% (W/L 25/27). When comparing the statistics of both players to determine the favored contender, it is crucial to consider the event level at which they have been competing.

Head-to-Head Rivalry:

In their previous encounters, Siniakova has emerged victorious in 5 out of 9 matches, while Mladenovic has tasted triumph 4 times. Their battles have witnessed the contestation of 21 thrilling sets, with Siniakova securing 11 victories and Mladenovic clinching 10. The most recent clash between Siniakova and Mladenovic occurred at the Istanbul Open on April 21, 2021. It was a gripping duel played on clay, culminating in Siniakova securing a hard-fought triumph with a scoreline of 6-4, 3-6, 6-4.

Head-to-Head Match Duration:

In previous head-to-head matchups, these exceptional players have engaged in battles lasting an average of 1 hour, 39 minutes, and 42 seconds.

Predicting Deciding Set Outcomes:

Throughout their riveting rivalry, Siniakova and Mladenovic have engaged in deciding sets on three occasions. Siniakova demonstrated her tenacity by securing victory in two of these encounters, while Mladenovic emerged triumphant once. This colossal statistic proves instrumental in predicting the outcome of their upcoming clash should it extend to the decisive set.

Head-to-Head Under Extreme Pressure:

Within their intense rivalry, Siniakova and Mladenovic have navigated two tiebreaks, both of which Siniakova conquered, leaving Mladenovic without a victory. This compelling insight provides substantial guidance when assessing the outcome of a potential tiebreak situation.

Opponent Quality Statistics:

In the past 12 months, Siniakova has confronted opponents with an average rank of 164.23. Comparatively, Mladenovic has encountered adversaries with an average rank of 239.59. These opponent quality statistics shed light on the level of competition each player has confronted and can greatly influence match predictions.

Deciding Set Performance against All Players:

For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, it is crucial to note that Siniakova has displayed remarkable proficiency in deciding sets over the past year, capturing victory in 50% of such encounters. Mladenovic, while still commendable, has achieved triumph in 39% of all matches played on the tour. Bearing these numbers in mind can prove highly advantageous in evaluating potential outcomes.

Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics:

While past player performances offer invaluable insights in predicting tennis matches, current event statistics assume equal importance once a tournament is underway. It is advisable to direct attention to the section below for a comprehensive understanding of Siniakova's and Mladenovic's performance in the current event. Furthermore, certain players exhibit enhanced efficiency in particular tournaments, and this variable should be duly considered when forecasting the ultimate result.

Break Point Conversion:

Recent statistics highlight Siniakova's ability to seize the opportunity when faced with a breakpoint, converting an impressive 45.08% of such chances. Mladenovic, too, exhibits proficiency in this department, capitalizing on 54.03% of her opportunities to break an opponent's serve. This crucial statistic holds immense significance for in-game live betting tips whenever a player finds themselves in a precarious breakpoint scenario.

If you wish to explore tennis match prediction models, refer to this article (Warning: Exclusive to stats enthusiasts).